Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Cross-Linguistic Transfer in Tagalog-Iloko Bilingual Learning: A Morphosemantic Analysis of Cognates in Nueva Ecija

Authors

Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
316 Article Views 82 PDF Downloads 0 Crossref Citations

Abstract

Cross-linguistic similarity can provide useful lexical cues in bilingual learning, yet form overlap can also create confusion when meanings diverge. This study examines how morphosemantic relationships between Tagalog and Iloko cognates relate to cross-linguistic facilitation and interference in a multilingual educational context in Nueva Ecija, Philippines. A descriptive-qualitative design involved 32 participants (16 students and 16 Filipino-language teachers) from two universities. Data were generated through four focus-group discussions, informant interviews, and archival research; teacher participants additionally supported linguistic analysis and sentence construction. Cognates were examined for word structure, semantic correspondence, lexical and syntactic distribution, and reported effects on first- and second-language use. The dataset showed more cognates with similar meanings than cognates with dissimilar meanings, while the pattern for frequently observed affixes was reversed; systematic phonological and morphological correspondences were also identified. Participants most frequently described false or polysemous cognates as sources of confusion, but they also reported that familiar cognates supported second-language learning by connecting new forms with prior lexical knowledge; this perceived contribution was stronger for second-language learning than for first-language communication. The findings position morphosemantic similarity as both a learning resource and a potential interference mechanism, extending a descriptive Philippine-language analysis toward cross-linguistic lexical learning and bilingual cognition.

 

IMPACT STATEMENT

The study shows why structurally similar words across Tagalog and Iloko should not be treated only as linguistic curiosities. In multilingual classrooms, reliable form-meaning correspondences may be used as explicit lexical bridges, while false or polysemous cognates require contrastive attention to prevent misinterpretation. For language educators in Philippine multilingual settings, the evidence supports instruction that develops metalinguistic awareness of recurring sound, affix, and meaning patterns while distinguishing participant-reported facilitation from experimentally measured learning effects. This framing also provides a basis for future developmental and experimental studies of bilingual vocabulary learning.

References

1
L. M. Bailey, K. Lockary, and E. Higby, “Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence for ubiquitous facilitation and context-dependent interference effects on lexical processing,” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 495–514, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728923000597.
2
H. Xue, R. Deng, Y. Chen, and W. Zheng, “How does bilingual experience influence novel word learning? Evidence from comparing L1-L3 and L2-L3 cognate status,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 1003199, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003199.
3
G. Garcia-Castro, D. S. Avila-Varela, I. Castillejo, and N. Sebastian-Galles, “Cognate beginnings to bilingual lexical acquisition,” Child Development, vol. 96, pp. 286–300, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14170.
4
E. Koutamanis, G. J. Kootstra, T. Dijkstra, and S. Unsworth, “The role of cognates and language distance in simultaneous bilingual children’s productive vocabulary acquisition,” Language Learning, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 347–378, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12666.
5
R. A. Marks, D. Labotka, X. Sun, N. Nickerson, K. Zhang, R. L. Eggleston, C.-L. Yu, Y. Uchikoshi, F. Hoeft, and I. Kovelman, “Morphological awareness and its role in early word reading in English monolinguals, Spanish-English, and Chinese-English simultaneous bilinguals,” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 268–283, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000517.
6
X. Sun, K. Zhang, R. A. Marks, N. Nickerson, R. L. Eggleston, C.-L. Yu, T.-L. Chou, T. Tardif, and I. Kovelman, “What’s in a word? Cross-linguistic influences on Spanish-English and Chinese-English bilingual children’s word reading development,” Child Development, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 84–100, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13666.
7
T. Wang and H. Zhang, “Examining the dimensionality of morphological knowledge and morphological awareness and their effects on second language vocabulary knowledge,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, Art. no. 1207854, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1207854.
8
E. Flores-Salgado and A. Falú Gutiérrez-Koyoc, “Working memory and cross-linguistic influence on vocabulary acquisition,” Brain Sciences, vol. 14, no. 8, Art. no. 796, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14080796.
9
M. Sampedro Mella, “An approach to the lexical ambiguity caused by false cognates in Spanish L2: A corpus-based exploratory study,” Studia Linguistica, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 186–205, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12225.
10
M. Muylle, E. Van Assche, and R. J. Hartsuiker, “Comparing the cognate effect in spoken and written second language word production,” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 93–107, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000444.
11
A. Otwinowska, “Cross-linguistic influence and language co-activation in acquiring L3 words: What empirical evidence do we have so far?” Second Language Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 765–783, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583231176371.
12
M. Aridan, U. Hijriyah, K. N. Khabibjonovna, H. Geng, I. Azad, and T. Elyas, “Pre-service language teachers’ readiness for deep learning approaches: Insights from a cross-regional study in Asia,” LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 527–551, 2025. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i2.12274.
13
U. Hijriyah, R. N. Edi, M. Aridan, H. U. Hashim, Erlina, and G. C. Kesuma, “How effective is SUNO.AI in enhancing Arabic listening skills? An evaluation of AI-based personalized learning,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 391–407, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.2.2251.
14
J. A. Villarama, R. V. Pilien, and C. I. Villamar, “Utilization of Padlet in second language teaching: Practices, challenges, and opportunities,” LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 257–274, 2025. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i1.9015.
15
J. A. Villarama, L. M. M. V. Dela Cruz, K. J. C. Barcelita, and B. J. V. Jose, “Reconceptualizing English language teaching in the Philippines: Interplay of journaling and emotions,” LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 984–1001, 2025. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i2.9067.
16
G. M. Aceron, Hambingang Wika. San Miguel, Manila, Philippines: Komisyon ng Wikang Filipino, 2013.
17
A. S. Agcaoili, Gramatika Ti Kontemporaryo Nga Ilokano. Quezon City, Philippines: Undertow Books, 2013.
18
V. S. Almario, Pagpaplanong Wika at Filipino. Manila, Philippines: Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://kwf.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Pagpaplanong-Wika-at-Filipino.pdf
19
R. Bernales et al., Akademikong Filipino para sa Kompetetibong Pilipino. Valenzuela City, Philippines: Mutya Publishing House, Inc., 2013.
20
L. Bloomfield, An Introduction to the Study of Language. New York, NY, USA: Henry Holt and Company, 1963.
21
P. C. Constantino, Filipino at Pagpaplanong Pangwika: Ikalawang Sourcebook ng Sangfil. Quezon City, Philippines: UP Sentro ng Wikang Filipino, 2005.
22
F. de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, 3rd ed., R. Harris, Trans. Chicago, IL, USA: Open Court Publishing Company, 1986.
23
D. M. Fetterman, Ethnography: Step by Step. London, U.K.: Sage Publications, 1989.
24
T. F. Fortunato, Mga Pangunahing Etnolinggwistikong Grupo sa Pilipinas. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University Press, 1993.
25
L. G. Garcia, Makabagong Gramar ng Filipino. Sampaloc, Manila, Philippines: Rex Bookstore Inc., 2000.
26
T. Llamzon, Handbook of Philippine Language Groups. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Publishing Co., 1978.
27
C. McFarland, A Linguistic Atlas of the Philippines, Monograph Series No. 15. Tokyo, Japan: Institute for the Study of Language and Culture of Asia and Africa, 1980.
28
N. U. Rosal, Pagbasa at Pagsulat sa mga Wika sa Pilipinas (Ilokano). Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines, 2011.
29
A. O. Santiago and N. G. Tiangco, Makabagong Balarilang Filipino, Binagong Edisyon 2003. Quezon City, Philippines: Rex Printing Company, Inc., 2009.
30
S. B. Vega, “Ang Wikang Filipino bilang Wikang Panlahat: Ang Kasaysayan ng Wikang Pambansa Tungo sa Pagpaplanong Pangwika 1935–2010.” Quezon City, Philippines: Komisyon ng Wikang Pambansa, n.d.
31
P. Villafuerte et al., Literatura ng mga Rehiyon sa Pilipinas. Valenzuela City, Philippines: Mutya Publishing House, Inc., 2006
32
A. S. Agcaoili, “Ilokano and Amianan studies, Northern Luzon cultures, and the universities from the regions: Towards a theory and praxis,” in Final Proceedings of the 2006 Nakem Centennial Conference, Part III: Conference Papers, 2006.
33
L. T. Ballesteros, Tagalog-Ilokano Cognates with Identical, Related and Different Meanings. Surian ng Wikang Pambansa, 1983.
34
M. S. Bulaong, “Talisip: Talas ng isip sa pananaliksik sa panimulang pag-aaral ng wika,” Journal sa Filipino ng BULSU-PSWF. El Bulakenyo Printing House, 2013.
35
J. P. Clausen, “Lexical relations in Ilokano for an Ilokano lexical database,” Philippine Journal of Linguistics, vol. 37, no. 1, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Philippine%20Journal%20of%20Linguistics/2006/JUNE%202006%2C%20VOL%2037%20No%201.pdf
36
P. C. Constantino, “Ganito na noon, ganito uli ngayon: Pagtalunton sa kasaysayan at daynamiks ng multilinggwal na edukasyon sa Pilipinas,” Daluyan: Journal ng Wikang Filipino, vol. 20, pp. 190–205, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/djwf/article/download/4360/3959
37
B. T. Cunanan, “Mekini abe: Mangan tamu: Isang etnolinggwistikong pagsulyap sa kultura at wika ng mga Kapampangan,” Journal sa Filipino ng BULSU-PSWF. El Bulakenyo Printing House, 2013.
38
A. Y. Aikhenvald, “Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective,” in Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, Eds. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 1–66, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199207831.003.0001.
39
S. E. Carroll, “On cognates,” Second Language Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 93–119, Jun. 1992, https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839200800201.
40
I. Elgort, “Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test,” Language Testing, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 253–272, Apr. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212459028.
41
V. Janke and M. Kolokonte, “False cognates: The effect of mismatch in morphological complexity on a backward lexical translation task,” Second Language Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 137–156, Apr. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314545836.
42
I. Potapova, H. K. Blumenfeld, and S. Pruitt-Lord, “Cognate identification methods: Impacts on the cognate advantage in adult and child Spanish-English bilinguals,” International Journal of Bilingualism, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 714–731, Dec. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915586586.
43
M. Rosselli, A. Ardila, M. B. Jurado, and J. L. Salvatierra, “Cognate facilitation effect in balanced and non-balanced Spanish-English bilinguals using the Boston Naming Test,” International Journal of Bilingualism, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 649–662, Dec. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912466313.
44
M. B. Acraman, Deceptive Cognates of Cebuano, Maranao and Pilipino Dialects. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines, 1976.
45
L. N. Aquino, “Contrastive analysis of true and false cognates of Tagalog and Ilokano dialects,” 2011.
46
R. V. Nartea, Deceptive Cognates of Tagalog, Iloko, Pangasinan and Kapampangan Dialects. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines, 1970.
47
J. G. Serdoncillo, Pag-aaral ng Tunay at Di-tunay na Kogneyt sa Wikang Pilipino at Hiligaynon. Manila, Philippines: Philippine Normal University, 1968.
48
E. G. Tabujara, Deceptive Cognates of Visayan Dialects and Tagalog. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines, 1969.

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue

Citation Impact

Crossref Cited-by

0
0 citations

Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.

Last checked 05 Nov 2026.